♾ Systematic Module

_{Interview with Farouk Y. Seif}

_{The Enchantment of „De-Sign“: Navigation Toward Meaning-Making ☀ Farouk Y. Seif}

_{Daydreams and Dark Magic: Semiotics and the Meaning of Evil ☀ Kirk Kanzelberger}

_{What is Cognitive Semiotics? ☀ Göran Sonesson}

_{Semiotics and Architecture: The Dialogical Hope (Past and Future) ☀ Josep Muntañola Thornberg}

_{Reading and teaching literature digitally: a cultural semiotic perspective ☀ Alexandra Milyakina}

_{„De-Sign“: The Mutual Fulfillment of God's Will and Human Desire (John Deely/Jacques Maritain Lecture Series) ☀ Farouk Y. Seif}

_{Marginal spaces of the city: structures and images ☀ Olga Lavrenova}

_{Hypnotherapy, Epistemology and Semiotics ☀ Maurício Neubern}

_{Life sciences and the humanities ☀ Anton Markoš}

_{Ethnosemiotics: An Outline ☀ Francesco Marsciani}

_{Meaning as the structure of information flows through the world ☀ Daniel Polani}

_{The singularity of relation and the threads of communication ☀ Paul Bains}

_{Minimum as a Sign in Contemporary Architecture ☀ Dragana Vasilski}

_{Semiotics and Education: Action-Theoretical Point of View ☀ Eetu Pikkarainen}

_{The contested relation to reality of "the creative treatment of actuality”: a triadic semiotic critique ☀ Fernando Andacht}

_{Time and the Sensible ☀ Júlio Pinto}

_{Philosophy as a Habit of Cenoscopic Inquiry: or How to Ask After the General that Transpires Through the Particular ☀ Luigi Russi}

_{Peircean Robotics: Semiotics applied to the Emergence of Symbols ☀ Takafumi Kato}

_{Semiotics and Dark Web Memes ☀ Robert W. Gehl}

_{Logic as a Liberal Art ☀ Christopher S. Morrissey}

_{Songbirds of the Primate Umwelt: A Zoosemiotic Analysis of „Nomascus“ Gibbons ☀ Baranna Baker and Sofi Berstein}

_{Performing Arts in a Process of Semiosis ☀ Bujar Hoxha}

_{Becoming-Minority: Subjectivity and Suprasubjectivity ☀ Mahmoud Reza Moghaddam Shad}

Common recommendation

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Recommendations by Farouk Y. Seif

Deely, J. (2001). Four ages of understanding: the first postmodern survey of philosophy from ancient times to the turn of the twenty-first century. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442675032

Deely, J. (2007). Intentionality and Semiotics: A Story of Mutual Fecundation. University of Scranton Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/I/bo5459810.html

Gebser, J. (1985). The ever-present origin. Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1839–1914). The Collected Papers of Charles S. Peirce, Vols. I–VI, ed. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss. Vols. VII–VIII, ed. A. W. Burks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (1948). The Psychology of Imagination, trans. J. Webber. New York: Philosophical Library.

Seif, F. Y. (2015). Reality Beyond Humanities-Science Schism: : Revealing the Mutuality of Design and Semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 31(3–4), 311–336.

Seif, F. Y. (2018). Imaginary Dialogue with John Deely: Playing with Boundaries Across Space and Time. The American Journal of Semiotics, 34.1–2, 189–227.

Seif, F. Y. (2018). Wholophilia: Design and the Metamorphoses of the Absolute. In D. Teters & O. Neumaier (Eds.) Metamorphoses of the Absolute (pp. 237-256). UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Farouk, Y. S. (2019). Beyond Forecasting and Prediction: The Role of Phantasmagorical Memory in Imagining the Future. Вісник КНЛУ. Серія Філологія [Bulletin of the National Linguistic University of Kyiv. Philology Series], 22(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2019.170192

Seif, F. Y. (2020). De-Sign as a Destiny of Negation: The Paradox of Sustaining Boundaries While Traversing Borders. The American Journal of Semiotics, 36.3–4, 179–215.

Seif, F. Y. (2020). The Role of Pragmatism in De-Sign: Persevering Through Paradoxes of Design and Semiotics. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia, 21.1, 112–131.

Recommendations by Maurício Neubern

Deely, J. (2010). Semiotic animal: a postmodern definition of human being transcending patriarchy and feminism: to supersede the ancient and medieval “animal rationale” along with the modern “res cogitans.” South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press.

Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1979). Hypnotherapy, an exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington Publishers : Distributed by Halsted Press.

Kopenawa, D., Albert, B., Elliott, N., & Dundy, A. (2013). The falling sky: words of a Yanomami shaman. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726116

Nathan, T. (2015). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde. Les enjeux de l’ethnopsychiatrie. Paris: Points.

Neubern, M. da S. (2016). Iconicity and Complexity in Hypnotic Communication. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(spe). https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-3772e32ne217

Neubern, M. da S. (2019). Complex hypnosis contributions to clinical psychology. In C. Antloga, K. T. Brasil, S. R. Lordello, M. Neubern, & E. Queiroz (Eds.), Psicologia clínica e cultura contemporânea 4 (pp. 71–90). Brasília: Technopolitik.

Seif, F. Y. (2019). «De-Sign» in the Transmodern World. Bern and New York: Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1055255

Stengers, I. (2002). L’Hypnose entre magie et science (Psychanalyse et psychiatrie edition.). Paris: Empecheurs.

Stengers, I. (2001). Qu’est-ce que l’hypnose nous oblige à penser ?. Ethnopsy, 3, 13–68.

Recommendations by Göran Sonesson

Sonesson G. (2021). Nothing human is foreign to me - except some of it. From the semiotic tradition to cognitive semiotic by the way of phenomenology. Degrés, 186-187 (pp. b1-b23).

Sonesson G. (2021). Considerations on the subtle art of integrating linguistics (and/or semiotics). K. Willems & C. Munteanu (Eds.) In Eugenio Coseriu: past, present and future (pp. 151-164). Berlin: deGruyter.

Sonesson G. (2019) The Psammetichus Syndrome and Beyond: Five Experimental Approaches to Meaning-Making. The American Journal of Semiotics, 35.1–2 (pp. 11–32).

Sonesson G. (2019) Elements of Peircean phenomenology. From categories to signs by way of grounds. Semiotica, 228 (pp. 259–285). https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0086

Sonesson G. (2019) La sémiotique cognitive. Le même et l’autre de la sémiotique structurale. In A. Biglari (Ed.) La sémiotique et son autre (pp. 147-160). Paris: Kimé.

Sonesson G. (2018) Meaning Redefined: Reflections on the Scholastic Heritage Conveyed by John Deely to Contemporary Semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics, 34.1–2 (pp. 65–86).

Sonesson G. (2017) Mastering phenomenological semiotics with Husserl and Peirce. In K. Bankov & P. Cobley (Eds.) Semiotics and its masters, 1 (pp. 83-104). Berlin: de Gruyter.

Recommendations by Juan Mendoza-Collazos

Mendoza-Collazos, J., & Zlatev, J. (2022). A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Agency: Assessing Ideas from Cognitive Scienc and Neuroscience. Biosemiotics, 1-30. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12304-022-09473-z

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C., Zlatev, J., & Sonesson, G. (2021). The origins and evolution of design: A stage-based model. In E. Pagni & R. Theisen (Eds.), Biosemiotics: The natural foundations of symbolism. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-85265-8_8

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C. (2020). On the importance of things: a relational approach to agency. Cognitive Semiotics, 13.2, 1–11. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cogsem-2020-2034/html

Mendoza-Collazos, J. C., & Sonesson, G. (2021). Revisiting the life of things: A cognitive semiotic study of the agency of artefacts in Amazonia. Public Journal of Semiotics, 9.2, 30–52. https://journals.lub.lu.se/pjos/article/view/22012

Recommendations by Alexandra Milyakina

Negotiating Spaces for Literacy Learning: Multimodality and Governmentality (2015) ed. M. Hamilton, R. Heydon, K. Hibbert, & R. Stooke. London; New York: Bloomsbury.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.

Lotman, J. (1990). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. London: I.B. Tauris & Co.

Popovič, A., & Macri, F.M. (1977). Literary Synthesis. Canadian Review of Comparative Literature, 4.2, 118-132.

Ojamaa, M., & Torop P. (2015). Transmediality of cultural autocommunication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 18.1, 61–78.

Torop, P.; Ojamaa, M.; Fadeev, A.; Milyakina, A.; Pilipovec, T.; Rickberg, M. (2019) Culture as education: transmediality and digitality in cultural autocommunication. Sign Systems Studies, 47.1/2, 152−176.

Scolari, C.A., Masanet, M.-J., Guerrero-Pico, M., & Establés, M.-J. (2018). Transmedia literacy in the new media ecology: Teens’ transmedia skills and informal learning strategies. El profesional de la información, 27.4, 801-812.

Unsworth, L. (2006). E-literature for children: Enhancing digital literacy learning. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

Recommendations by Maurício Neubern

Akstein, D. (1973). Terpsichoretherapy: a new hypnotherapeutic method. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 21, 121–129.

Akstein, D. (1992). Un voyage à travers la Terpsichore – Transe – Thérapie. Paris: Sand/Tchou.

Bioy, A. & Servillat, T. (2017), Construire la communication thérapeutique avec l’hypnose. Paris, France: Dunod.

Brentano, F. (1887 [1995]). Descriptive psychology. Routledge.

Calcaterra, R. (2011). Varieties of synechism: Peirce and James on mind-world continuity. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 25 (4), 412–424.

Carroy, J. (1991). L’invention des sujets. Hypnose et suggestion. Paris: Puf.

Chertok, L. & Stengers, I. (1989). Le Coeur et la raison. L’hypnose en question de Lavoisier à Lacan. Paris: Payot.

Clément, C. (2011). L’appel de la transe. Paris: Stok.

Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self. Suny.

Colapietro, V. (2016). Habits, awareness, and autonomy. In D. West & M. Anderson (Eds.). Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit. (pp. 297–313). Springer.

Deely, J. (2002). What distinguishes human understanding? Indiana: Saint Augustine Press.

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyer.

Deely, J. (2010). Semiotic animal. Indiana: Saint Augustine Press.

Erickson, B. & Keeney, B. (2006). Milton H. Erickson, MD.: An american healer. Sedona: Ringing Rook Press.

Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1979). Hypnotherapy: an exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington.

Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1980). The collected papers of Milton Erickson, MD. New York: Irvington.

Erickson, M. (1992). Creative choice in hypnosis. Irvington.

Fann, K. T. (2010). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Partridge.

Favareau, D. (2010). Essential readings in biosemiotics. Springer.

Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 15–31.

Gergen, K. (1996). Realidad y relaciones. Paidós.

Gonzalez Rey, F. (2019). Subjectivity in debate: some reconstructed philosophical premises to advance its debates in psychology. Journal of Theory and Social Behavior, 49, 1–23.

Gordin, M. (2021). On the fringe. Where science meets pseudoscience. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul. Multiple personalities and the sciences of memory. Princeton : Princeton University Press.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.

Ibri, I. (2015). Kósmos Nóetos. The metaphysical architecture of Charles Peirce. Bern: Springer.

Jappy, T. (2018). Peirce’s twenty-eight classes of signs and the philosophy of representation. Bloomsbury.

Koch, S. (1981). Nature and limits of psychological knowledge. American Psychologist, 36 (3), 257–269.

Kuhn, T. (1962 [2012]). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lévy, A. (1997). Sciences cliniques et organisations sociales. Puf.

Liszka, J. (1996). A general introduction to the semeiotic of Charles Sanders Peirce. Indiana University Press.

Morin, E. (2014). La méthode V. l’Identité humanine. L’humanité de l’humanité. Seuil. (original work published 1991).

Nathan, T. (2014). Nous ne sommes pas seuls au monde. Seuil.

Neubern, M. (2016). Iconicity and complexity in hypnotic communication. Psicologia: Teoria & Pesquisa, 32, 1–9.

Neubern, M. (2017). Iconicity as a possibility of qualitative research. Psicologia em Estudo, 22 (4), 505–515.

Neubern, M. (2018). Clínicas do transe. Etnopsicologia, hipnose e subjetividade no Brasil. Juruá: Curitiba.

Neubern, M. & Nogueira, H. (2019). Complex hypnosis contribution to clinical psychology. In: C. Antloga, K. Brasil, S. Lordello, M. Neubern, E. Queiroz (Eds.). Psicologia Clínica e Cultura 4. (pp. 71–90). Technopolitik.

Nöth, W. (2012). Charles Peirce’s theory of information: a theory of growth of symbols and knowledge. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 19 (2), 137–161.

Nöth, W. (2015). The paradigms of iconicity in language and literature. In M. Hiraga; W. Herlofsky; K. Shinohara & K. Akita. (Eds.). Iconicity: East meets west. (pp. 13–34). Amsterdan, Nederland: John Benjamins.

Nöth, W. (2016). Habits, habit change, and the habit of habit change according to Peirce. In D. West & A. Myrdene (Eds.). Consensus on Peirce’s concept of habit. Before and beyond consciousness. (pp. 35–64). Springer.

Peirce, C. (1866-1913 [1931-1958]). The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (8 vols). In A. Burks (Ed.). Harvard University Press.

Peirce, C. (1893-1913 [1998]). The essential Peirce: selected philosophical writings, Volume 2: 1893-1913. N. Houser (Ed.). Indiana University Press.

Peirce, C. (1903 [1997]). Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking. The 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. P. Turrisi, (Ed.). State of New York Press.

Petrilli, S. (2017). The self as a sign, the world, and the other. Routledge.

Psillos, S. & Zorzato, L. (2021). Against cognitive instrumentalism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 33 (4): 1–11.

Raposa, M. (2020). Theosemiotics: religion, reading and the gift of meaning. New York: Fordham University Press.

Roustang, F. (2015). Jamais contre, d’abord. La présence d’un corps. Odile Jacob.

Santaella, L. (2004). O método anticartesiano de C. S. Peirce. Unifesp.

Santos, B. & Meneses, M. (2009). Epistemologias do sul. Cortez.

Schechner, R. (2013). Performance studies. An introduction. London, England: Routledge.

Seif, F. (2019). De-sing in transmodern world. Envisioning reality beyond absoluteness. Peter Lang.

Seif, F. (2020). The role of pragmatism in De-sign: persevering through paradoxes of design and semiotics. Cognitio, 21 (1): 112–131.

Sharov, A. & Thonnessen, M. (2022). Semiotics agency. Bern: Springer.

Stengers, I. (1995). L’invention des sciences modernes. Flammarion.

Stengers, I. (2001). Qu’est-ce que l’hypnose nous oblige à penser ?. Ethnopsy, 3, 13–68.

Stengers, I. (2002). Hypnose : entre magie et science. Paris : Synthélabo.

Tukaev, R. (2020). The integrative theory of hypnosis in the light of clinical hypnotherapy. In: Mordeniz, C. (ed). Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy. (pp. 234–249). Namik Kemal University.

Whitehead, A. (1929 [1978]). Process and reality. The Free Press.

Recommendations by Anton Markoš

Deely, J. (2009). Purely objective reality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Deely, J. (2009). Augustine & Poinsot. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Deely, J. (2010). Medieval philosophy redefined. Scranton: University of Scranton Press.

Markoš, A. (2002). Readers of the Book of life. Contextualizing developmental evolutionary biology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Markoš, A. (2016). The birth and life of species–cultures. Biosemiotics, 9 (pp. 73–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9252-1.

Markoš, A., Grygat, F., Hajnal, L., Kratochvíl, Z., & Neubauer, Z. (2009). Life as its own designer. Darwins Origin and Western thought. Springer.

Markoš, A., Švorcová, J. (2019). Epigenetic processes and the evolution of life. CRC Press.

Švorcová, J., Markoš, A., Das, P. (2017). Origins of the Cellular Biosphere. In Sahi, V. P. & Baluska, F. (Eds.), Concepts in Cell Biology - History and Evolution (pp. 271–290). Springer.

Recommendations by Dragana Vasilski

Vasilski, D. (2021). The specific Modernity of Architecture – The Phenomenological Space of Silence. In 19th International Conference Arquitectonics: Mind, Land and Society, The new Sense of Place after the Biorevolution: Education, Profession, and Social Interaction, Barcelona, June 2-4 2021 (pp. 117–128). ISBN- 978-84-09-38268-2. https://pa.upc.edu/ca/Varis/altres/arqs/congresos/19th-conference/finalpapers-2021.pdf/view.

Vasilski, D. (2021). Color as a sign in minimalist architecture. In Griber, Y. A. & Schindler, V. M. (Eds.), The International Scientific Conference of the Color Society of Russia: Selected Papers (pp. 325–330). Smolensk: Smolensk State University Press. ISBN 978-5-88018-660-0. http://color-lab.org/files/283/bop_rucolor2020_with0.pdf.

Vasilski, D. (2020). Un Espace Couvert par la Forme d’une Boîte. In Pellegrino, P. (Ed.), L‘Architecture du Sens (pp. 81-106). Sémiotique de l’espace, v.3. ALSA&S. https://www.ias-st.com https://www.ias-st.com/prof-pellegrino-ft.

Vasilski, D. (2020). Sense of simplicity as a model of meaning in cultural landscape Case study: Minimalism in Architecture. Human Being: Image and Essence. Humanitarian Aspects 41(1) (pp. 91-112). Moscow: INION RAN. DOI: 10.31249/chel/2020.01.06. https://human-inion.org/en/article.php?id=151%20.

Vasilski, D. (2020). Semiotics and Aesthetics as a Discourse on Architecture. Case Study: Minimalism in Architecture. In Actas 14^o Congreso Mundial de Semiótica: Trayectorias Proceedings of the 14th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies (IASS/AIS) Buenos Aires, 9 al 13 de septiembre de 2019 v.6 (pp. 283-297). E-ISBN: 978-987-47805-5-3, DOI: 10.24308 /IASS-2019-6-024.

Nikolić, M.& Vasilski, D. (2017). Minimalism in contemporary architecture as one of the most usable aesthetically-functional patterns. Facta Universitatis 15(3) (pp. 333-345). DOI: 10.2298/FUACE160814029N. http://casopisi.junis.ni.ac.rs/index.php/FUArchCivEng/article/view/2067.

Vasilski, D. (2016). On Minimalism in Architecture-Space as experience. Spatium 65 (pp. 61-66) http://spatium.rs/index.php/home/article/view/40https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1636061V.

Vasilski, D. (2015). Minimalism in Architecture: Abstract Conceptualization of Architecture (Minimalizam u arhitekturi: Apstraktna konceptualizacija arhitekture). Arhitektura i urbanizam 40 (pp. 16-23). COBISS.SR-ID 8014860. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-6055/2015/0354-60551540016V.pdf.

Vasilski, D. (2014). Minimalism in Architecture: The Juxtaposition between Architecture and Sculpture. Novi Sad: MATICA SRPSKA 42 (pp. 271-285).

Vasilski, D. (2014). On minimalism in architecture - Expression of Materials and Light. Saarbrücken: Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. ISBN: 978-3-659-56079-8 https://www.amazon.com/Minimalism-Architecture-Expression-MaterialsLight/dp/3659560790.

Vasilski D. (2013). Minimalism in Architecture: Materials as Instruments of Immaterial Reality Perception (Minimalizam u arhitekturi: Materijali kao instrumenti percepcije nematrerijalne stvarnosti). Arhitektura i urbanizam 37 (pp. 03-27). ISSN 0354-6055, COBISS.SR-ID 8014860. https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-6055/2013/0354-60551337003V.pdf.

Vasilski, D. (2012). Minimalism in Architecture: Architecture as a Language of its Identity (Minimalizam u arhitekturi: Kako jezik arhitekture predstavlja njen identitet). Arhitektura i urbanizam 34 (pp. 42-64). ISSN 0354-6055 COBISS.SR-ID 8014860. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=en&user=p38jvUUAAAAJ&citation_for_view=p38jvUUAAAAJ:9yKSN-GCB0IC.

Vasilski, D. (2011). In search of the roots of minimalism in architecture: Formal Silence of Adolf Loos (U traganju za korenima minimalizma u arhitekturi: Formalna tišina Adolfa Losa). Arhitektura i urbanizam 31 (pp. 16-34). ISSN 0354-6055 COBISS.SR-ID 8014860. http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0354-6055/2011/0354-60551131016V.pdf.

Recommendations by Fernando Andacht

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature : a necessary unity. New York: Dutton.

Bezerra, C. (2014). A personagem no documentário de Eduardo Coutinho. Campinas: Papirus Editora.

Bleger, J. (1960/1967). Psicoanálisis del encuadre psicoanalítico. In: Simbiosis y ambigüedad: estudio psicoanalítico. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Deely, J. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.

Engler, S. & Gardiner, M. (2012). Re-Mapping Bateson's Frame. Journal of Ritual Studies. 26 (2), 7-20.

Figuerõa, A. et al. (2003). O documentário como encontro. Interview with the film maker E. Coutinho. Galáxia. Revista transdisciplinar de Comunicação, Semiótica, Cultura 6, 213-232.

Goffman, E. (1974/1986). Frame Analysis. An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press Cambridge: Massachusetts & London, England, 1999.

Hoffmeyer, J. (ed.) (2008). A Legacy for Living Systems: Gregory Bateson as Precursor to Biosemiotics. New York: Springer.

Mesquita, C. & Lins, C (2014). O fim e O princípio. Entre o mundo e a cena. Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 49-63. http://novosestudos.uol.com.br/ v1/files/uploads/contents/ content_1565/file_1565.pdf

Peirce, C.S. (1931-1958). The Collected Papers of C. S. Peirce. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. Burks (Eds.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Ransdell, J. (2007). On the use and abuse of the immediate/dynamical object distinction. Arisbe The Peirce Gateway: http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/useabuse.htm

Xavier, I. (2010). O exemplar e o contingente no teatro das evidências. Literatura e Sociedade 14, 14-23.

Xavier, I. (2009).Character Construction in Brazilian Documentary Films: Modern Cinema, Classical Narrative and Micro-Realism. In: NAGIB, Lúcia & MELLO, Cecília (Eds.) Realism and the Audiovisual Media. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 210-223.